Dumbledore (yes, again).

J.K. Rowling or how to ruin a great(?) saga. 

Well, at least someone in the books had fun

If you don't live under a rock you've probably seen this in every social media the last days. J.K. is back on track on her way to give us new facts about her characters that magically (got it?) didn't appear in the books.

This time the damnified is Dumbledore (again). We been knew for a while that the Hogwarts director was gay. I couldn't be more pleased to know there was an lgtb character in a series this famous, the problem is where. Because that's it, it's never even mentioned in the books that Dumbledore was gay. Not even a line was dedicated to, at least stating he wasn't straight. Was it really that difficult to represent he was gay? She could've just write a thought in which Dumbledore had gotten like "damn I sure loved Grindelwald" but instead we get our beloved (no) J.K. telling it to us through Twitter.

This is nothing new, she's been "diversifying" her books since the movies ended, I put it in commas because the books are the same, she just throws random facts to make her seem more open minded (when surprisingly she's a well known racist and supports bigotry, who would've figured it right??) just like when she said Hermione was black but she decided to use a white acttress (with all due respect to Emma Watson, she did nothing wrong and is a great activist) in the movies because, why not?

For further information in how J.K. has been exploiting the saga through "fake" representation, this video gets more on the subject.